Stacey Scott

60 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Stacey Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 266
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 177
  • Health 412
  • Applied Psychology 235
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 461
Replace Jennifer R. Piazza with:
Jennifer R. Piazza United States
Damaris Aschwanden United States
Christiane A. Hoppmann Canada
Stefan Agrigoroaei United States
Gemma Lewis United Kingdom
Lisa M. Jaremka United States
Simon Forstmeier Germany
Bita Nouriani United States
Iris Reiner Germany
Averria Sirkin Martin United States
Stacey Scott relative to Jennifer R. Piazza United States Jennifer R. Piazza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jennifer R. Piazza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stacey Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey Scott. The network helps show where Stacey Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stacey Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stacey Scott Line = papers co-authored together Stacey Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015143
2 2013109
3 2013106
4 201884
5 201770
6 201666
7 201563
8 201260
9 201959
10 201151
11 201450
12 201449
13 201848
14 201748
15 201646
16 200742
17 201841
18 201639
19 201937
20 202134

About Stacey Scott

Stacey Scott is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (24 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (22 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (21 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (15 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (7 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers) and Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (266 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (177 citations), Health (412 citations), Applied Psychology (235 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (461 citations). Stacey Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Martin J. Sliwinski, Joshua M. Smyth, David M. Almeida, Christiane A. Hoppmann, Urs M. Nater, Jacqueline Mogle, Elizabeth Muñoz, C. S. Bergeman, Fredda Blanchard–Fields and Roxane Cohen Silver. Their work appears in journals such as Innovation in Aging, Psychology and Aging, The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Psycho-Oncology and International Journal of Eating Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact