Julia Gervasio
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 10%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Resilience and Mental Health
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Papers in
-
- Resilience and Mental Health 6
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 3
-
- Stress Responses and Cortisol 2
- Co-authors
- Jenny J. W. Liu (13 shared papers)Natalie Ein (10 shared papers)Kristin S. Vickers (5 shared papers)Maureen J. Reed (3 shared papers)Kenneth Fung (2 shared papers)Anthony Nazarov (6 shared papers)J. Don Richardson (5 shared papers)R. Nicholas Carleton (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (2 papers)Journal of Happiness Studies (1 paper)Anthrozoös (1 paper)Frontiers in Psychiatry (1 paper)Clinical Psychology Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Julia Gervasio
15 papers receiving 311 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Behavioral Neuroscience 48
- Clinical Psychology 148
- Applied Psychology 30
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 40
- Social Psychology 53
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Gervasio
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Gervasio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Gervasio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Gervasio more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Gervasio
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Gervasio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Gervasio. The network helps show where Julia Gervasio may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Julia Gervasio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 137 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 1 |
About Julia Gervasio
Julia Gervasio is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Sensory Systems and Pharmacology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Resilience and Mental Health (6 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1 paper) and Disaster Response and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (48 citations), Clinical Psychology (148 citations), Applied Psychology (30 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (40 citations) and Social Psychology (53 citations). Julia Gervasio has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jenny J. W. Liu, Natalie Ein, Kristin S. Vickers, Maureen J. Reed, Kenneth Fung, Anthony Nazarov, J. Don Richardson, R. Nicholas Carleton, Maureen G. Reed and Susan A. Bartels. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Happiness Studies, Anthrozoös, Frontiers in Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.