Julia Gervasio

515 citations
15 papers · 281 · h-index 6

Impact in

    • Stress Responses and Cortisol
    • Resilience and Mental Health
    • COVID-19 and Mental Health
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Papers in

Julia Gervasio

14 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Julia Gervasio
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 50
  • Clinical Psychology 179
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
  • Social Psychology 55
Replace Dana R. Holohan with:
Dana R. Holohan United States
Melissa Morton United States
Lauren St. Hill United States
Catherine M. Caska United States
Hanna Reich Germany
Barbara A. Hermann United States
Inga Boellinghaus United Kingdom
Ioulia Kokka Greece
Jens T. Kowalski Germany
Daniel Conybeare United States
Julia Gervasio relative to Dana R. Holohan United States Dana R. Holohan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Dana R. Holohan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Gervasio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Gervasio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Gervasio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Gervasio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Gervasio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Gervasio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Gervasio. The network helps show where Julia Gervasio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Julia Gervasio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Gervasio Line = papers co-authored together Julia Gervasio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2020122
2 201956
3 202146
4 202130
5 20238
6 20195
7 20203
8 20223
9 20202
10 20202
11 20241
12 20241
13 20241
14 20231
15 20250

About Julia Gervasio

Julia Gervasio is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 15 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Resilience and Mental Health (7 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers) and Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (50 citations), Clinical Psychology (179 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (44 citations) and Social Psychology (55 citations). Julia Gervasio has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jenny J. W. Liu, Natalie Ein, Kristin S. Vickers, Maureen J. Reed, Kenneth Fung, R. Nicholas Carleton, Anthony Nazarov, Jennifer E. C. Lee, Maureen G. Reed and J. Don Richardson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology Review, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry and Journal of Happiness Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact