Clinical Psychology Review

2.5k papers and 292.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Clinical Psychology Review in the last decades have received a total of 292.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Psychology Review usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.7k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (726 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (495 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (647 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (468 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (327 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Psychology Review are Robert A. Steer, Aaron T. Beck, Susan Nolen–Hoeksema, Amelia Aldao, E. David Klonsky, Susanne Schweizer, Todd B. Kashdan, Eleonora Gullone, Stefan G. Hofmann and Martin E. Franklin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Psychology Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Psychology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Psychology Review.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Psychology Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Psychology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Psychology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Psychology Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025