Natalie Dimier

2.0k citations
20 papers · 767 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Natalie Dimier

18 papers receiving 750 citations

Peers

Natalie Dimier
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 347
  • Genetics 184
  • Dermatology 131
  • Oncology 339
  • Immunology 116
Replace Gail Ryan with:
Gail Ryan Australia
Maria Delioukina United States
Beata Holkova United States
Vittoria Martin Switzerland
Marisol Mateo Spain
Adam P. Boyd United States
Martin Dreyling Germany
Sara Tedoldi United Kingdom
Sumeet Ambarkhane United States
Andreas Braeuninger Germany
Natalie Dimier relative to Gail Ryan Australia Gail Ryan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Gail Ryan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Dimier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Dimier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Dimier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Dimier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Dimier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Dimier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Dimier. The network helps show where Natalie Dimier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Dimier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Dimier Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Dimier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2017285
2 2016233
3 201754
4 202152
5 201825
6 201924
7 201920
8 201618
9 201911
10 201911
11 20197
12 20166
13 20175
14 20195
15 20154
16 20153
17 20223
18 20241
19 20200
20 20220

About Natalie Dimier

Natalie Dimier is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Immunology and Molecular Biology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 767 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (8 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (8 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (5 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (2 papers) and Viral-associated cancers and disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (347 citations), Genetics (184 citations), Dermatology (131 citations), Oncology (339 citations) and Immunology (116 citations). Natalie Dimier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Günter Fingerle‐Rowson, Laurie H. Sehn, Gilles Salles, Axel Hauschild, Nicole Basset‐Séguin, Claus Garbe, Christopher D. Lao, Pieternella J. Lugtenburg, Dédée F. Murrell and J. Fernando Quevedo. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Pharmaceutical Statistics, BMC Cancer, British Journal of Haematology and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact