Natalie Chen

1.8k citations
45 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Natalie Chen

41 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Natalie Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 348
  • Strategy and Management 163
  • Economics and Econometrics 272
  • Finance 87
  • Molecular Biology 440
Replace Patrick A. McLaughlin with:
Patrick A. McLaughlin United States
Hanwei Huang China
John Stevens United States
John R. Wells United States
Howard Chan Australia
Lewis D. Johnson Canada
James D. Peterson United States
Dylan C. Thomas United Kingdom
Alberto Musso Germany
Sunghyun Kim South Korea
Natalie Chen relative to Patrick A. McLaughlin United States Patrick A. McLaughlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Patrick A. McLaughlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Chen. The network helps show where Natalie Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Chen Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008136
2 2011103
3 2019103
4 202092
5 201866
6 201963
7 201759
8 201858
9 200447
10 201940
11 200836
12 200334
13 200324
14 200923
15 202122
16 200522
17 202121
18 201715
19 202014
20 201812

About Natalie Chen

Natalie Chen is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Molecular Biology, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global trade and economics (16 papers), Nuclear Structure and Function (8 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (8 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (6 papers), Global Trade and Competitiveness (5 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (5 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (5 papers) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (348 citations), Strategy and Management (163 citations), Economics and Econometrics (272 citations), Finance (87 citations) and Molecular Biology (440 citations). Natalie Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Dennis Novy, Andrew Scott, Jean Imbs, Stephen G. Young, Yiping Tu, Paul H. Kim, Loren G. Fong, Thomas A. Weston, Luciana Juvenal and Sachin B. Malik. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of International Economics, Journal of Oncology, Current Biology and Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact