Christopher Lim

34 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers

Christopher Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Human-Computer Interaction 49
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
  • Library and Information Sciences 7
  • Demography 53
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 29
Replace Jaana Näsänen with:
Jaana Näsänen Finland
Jorge Abreu Portugal
Wiesław Kopeć Poland
Jeferson Arango‐López Colombia
Sima Sedighadeli Australia
César Guevara Ecuador
Peter Novitzky United Kingdom
Natalie Freed United States
Phil Gray United Kingdom
Diego Fernando Loaiza Colombia
Christopher Lim relative to Jaana Näsänen Finland Jaana Näsänen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jaana Näsänen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Lim. The network helps show where Christopher Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Lim Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201858
2 200957
3 201549
4 201736
5 199525
6 201425
7 200918
8 201912
9 201712
10 201911
11 20168
12 20086
13
Lemmatic Machine Translation
20096
14 20155
15 20125
16 20174
17 20124
18 20114
19 20173
20
Evaluating Lemmatic Communication
20103

About Christopher Lim

Christopher Lim is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Demography, having authored 38 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Space Exploration and Technology (6 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (5 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (5 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (4 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (4 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (4 papers) and Spacecraft Design and Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (49 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations), Library and Information Sciences (7 citations), Demography (53 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (29 citations). Christopher Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Manuela Farinosi, Irene K.H. Chew, Abhinandan Jain, Amr Ahmed, Dávid Fröhlich, Rodney Mountain, Thilo Kroll, Patrick J. Heizer, Yiping Tu and Didier Hodzic. Their work appears in journals such as CoDesign, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Science Translational Medicine, Journal of Aircraft and Telematics and Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact