Nancy Mitchell

23 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

Nancy Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Marketing 58
  • Music 10
  • General Health Professions 63
  • Developmental Biology 5
  • Research and Theory 2
Replace Helen O’Sullivan with:
Helen O’Sullivan United Kingdom
Amparo Caballero Spain
Georges Vigarello France
Patrick C. Hughes United States
Matthew Dennis Netherlands
Natilene Bowker New Zealand
Snootfull
Brian Hill United States
David Foster Wallace United States
Kirk Besmer United States
Nancy Mitchell relative to Helen O’Sullivan United Kingdom Helen O’Sullivan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Helen O’Sullivan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Mitchell. The network helps show where Nancy Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Nancy Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200742
2 199841
3 201533
4 200333
5
Advertising & IMC: Principles and Practice
201125
6
Advertising & IMC : principles & practice
201519
7 200016
8 201513
9 200712
10 200112
11 19829
12 19968
13 20027
14 20216
15 20164
16 20163
17
Parallel Tracks, Same Terminus: The Role of Nineteenth-Century Newspapers and Railroads in the Settlement of Nebraska.
20092
18 19952
19 19962
20 20091

About Nancy Mitchell

Nancy Mitchell is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education, Marketing, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 24 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marketing and Advertising Strategies (2 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers), Management and Marketing Education (2 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (2 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (2 papers) and Brazilian History and Foreign Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (58 citations), Music (10 citations), General Health Professions (63 citations), Developmental Biology (5 citations) and Research and Theory (2 citations). Nancy Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sandra E. Moriarty, William D. Wells, Diane M. Badzinski, Thomas Schoonover, Timothy C. Guetterman, Charles A. McLemore, Michelle Hall, Róbert Wágner, Rhonda Cady and Edward S. Sekscenski. Their work appears in journals such as Innovative Higher Education, Disability and health journal, Zoo Biology, Nurse Educator and Journal Of Vacation Marketing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact