Nancy Mitchell

24 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Nancy Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Marketing 59
  • Music 13
  • General Health Professions 56
  • Developmental Biology 5
  • Gender Studies 21
Replace Stephen Robertson with:
Stephen Robertson Australia
Samantha Wilkinson United Kingdom
Tom Clark United Kingdom
Patrick C. Hughes United States
Bryan D. Byers United States
Jennifer R. Considine United States
Greggor Mattson United States
Janice Forsyth Canada
Intan Hashimah Mohd Hashim Malaysia
David E. Boyns United States
Nancy Mitchell relative to Stephen Robertson Australia Stephen Robertson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Stephen Robertson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Mitchell. The network helps show where Nancy Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Nancy Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200744
2 199843
3 201534
4 200333
5
Advertising & IMC: Principles and Practice
201128
6
Advertising & IMC : principles & practice
201520
7 200016
8 201515
9 200112
10 200712
11 20029
12 20219
13 19969
14 19829
15 20165
16 20105
17 20165
18
Parallel Tracks, Same Terminus: The Role of Nineteenth-Century Newspapers and Railroads in the Settlement of Nebraska.
20092
19
Creative Problem Solving: A Comparison of Techniques.
19952
20 19962

About Nancy Mitchell

Nancy Mitchell is a scholar working on Marketing, Music, Education, Management of Technology and Innovation and History, having authored 26 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Management and Marketing Education (2 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (2 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (2 papers), Marketing and Advertising Strategies (2 papers), Brazilian History and Foreign Policy (2 papers) and Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (59 citations), Music (13 citations), General Health Professions (56 citations), Developmental Biology (5 citations) and Gender Studies (21 citations). Nancy Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include William D. Wells, Sandra Ernst Moriarty, Diane M. Badzinski, Timothy C. Guetterman, Thomas David Schoonover, Charles A. McLemore, RHONDA G. CADY, Michelle Hall, Robert J. Wagner and Judith Sangl. Their work appears in journals such as Innovative Higher Education, Cold War History, The Journal of Military History, Journal of Endovascular Therapy and International Journal of Music Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact