N. Schooler

667 citations
18 papers · 517 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

N. Schooler

18 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers

N. Schooler
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Biological Psychiatry 45
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 252
  • Pharmacology 115
  • Clinical Psychology 132
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 71
Replace H. M. Emrich with:
H. M. Emrich Germany
R T Owen United Kingdom
Søren Korsgaard Denmark
Donald R. Kanter United States
J. Andersen Denmark
Shubhra Mace United Kingdom
Michael D. Teehan Canada
Anita S. Kablinger United States
Ataru Inagaki Japan
Eugene H. Makela United States
N. Schooler relative to H. M. Emrich Germany H. M. Emrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
H. M. Emrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Schooler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Schooler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Schooler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Schooler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Schooler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Schooler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Schooler. The network helps show where N. Schooler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Schooler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Schooler Line = papers co-authored together N. Schooler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
SAFTEE: a technique for the systematic assessment of side effects in clinical trials.
1986288
2 1991103
3
Obsessive-compulsive symptoms in schizophrenia: a comparison of olanzapine and placebo.
199640
4 199315
5 199313
6 198411
7 199510
8 199610
9 19896
10 19964
11 20034
12 19954
13 20033
14 19952
15 20031
16 19951
17 20141
18 20031

About N. Schooler

N. Schooler is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (12 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (45 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (252 citations), Pharmacology (115 citations), Clinical Psychology (132 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (71 citations). N. Schooler has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Levine, John M. Kane, Daniel Umbricht, Donna Ames, Michael Borenstein, S Mukherjee, J.A. Lieberman, John Rotrosen, Moran Rubinstein and José Alvir. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, European Neuropsychopharmacology, Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology and Clinical Neuropharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact