Monique Thomas

17 papers receiving 748 citations

Peers

Monique Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Biological Psychiatry 154
  • Pharmacology 180
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 182
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 29
  • Plant Science 276
Replace Zi-Wei Chen with:
Zi-Wei Chen United States
Maurício M. Oliveira Brazil
B. Bourrié France
Ebru Aydar United Kingdom
Monique Lazar France
Theresa M. Cabrera-Vera United States
Melvyn Baez United States
Wayland W.L. Cheng United States
Fengju Bai United States
Renza Roncarati Italy
Monique Thomas relative to Zi-Wei Chen United States Zi-Wei Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Zi-Wei Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Monique Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Monique Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monique Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monique Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Monique Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monique Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monique Thomas. The network helps show where Monique Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Monique Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Monique Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Monique Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2016165
2 1996128
3 2011104
4 1996102
5 201252
6 199343
7 202039
8 200038
9 202129
10 200315
11 202314
12 201012
13 20239
14 20253
15 20251
16 20131
17 20251
18 20260
19 20250

About Monique Thomas

Monique Thomas is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Plant Science, Spectroscopy and Pharmacology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 756 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (2 papers) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (154 citations), Pharmacology (180 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (182 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (29 citations) and Plant Science (276 citations). Monique Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Frederick Meins, Roland Beffa, Rose‐Marie Hofer, Kevin L. Behar, Gerard Sanacora, Golam M. I. Chowdhury, Douglas L. Rothman, Henk M. De Feyter, Robin A. de Graaf and Yong‐Yeon Cho. Their work appears in journals such as The Plant Cell, NMR in Biomedicine, Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, PLoS ONE and Analytical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact