Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
3.9k papers
receiving
74.2k citations
Peers
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 222
Nephrology6.1k
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism13.8k
Clinical Biochemistry3.5k
Physiology10.1k
Nutrition and Dietetics5.4k
Replace Medical Clinics of North America with:
Medical Clinics of North AmericaUnited States
Annual Review of MedicineUnited States
International Journal of CardiologyUnited States
Clinical BiochemistryCanada
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)Germany
Mediators of InflammationChina
International Journal of Molecular MedicineChina
QJMUnited Kingdom
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and PhysiologyAustralia
Journal of the American Heart AssociationUnited States
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicinerelative toMedical Clinics of North AmericaUnited StatesMedical Clinics of North America's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Medical Clinics of North America · 1×
×1.66k/4kNEPHR
×1.014k/13kEDM
×1.64k/2kCB
×0.610k/16kPHYSI
×1.25k/4kND
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine.
About Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
The 4.6k papers published in Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 87.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine usually cover Nephrology (376 papers), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (843 papers), Clinical Biochemistry (285 papers), Physiology (602 papers) and Toxicology (69 papers) specifically the topics of Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (302 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (235 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (158 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (137 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (135 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (134 papers), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (132 papers) and Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (115 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine are P. Trinder, Kevin Spencer, C. Selby, Callum G. Fraser, R. B. Payne, Mario Plebani, Julian H. Barth, David Newman, Michael J. Duffy and Peter J. Wood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.