Mo Chen

734 citations
28 papers · 593 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mo Chen

24 papers receiving 568 citations

Peers

Mo Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Marketing 260
  • Business and International Management 21
  • Food Science 169
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 14
  • Plant Science 262
Replace Ulrike Eberle with:
Ulrike Eberle Germany
Anetta Barska Poland
Arbindra Rimal United States
Lucia Baldi Italy
Ágoston Temesi Hungary
Shaosheng Jin China
Paul Rye Kledal Denmark
Lukáš Zagata Czechia
Laura Mørch Andersen Denmark
Benedetto Rocchi Italy
Mo Chen relative to Ulrike Eberle Germany Ulrike Eberle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ulrike Eberle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mo Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mo Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mo Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mo Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mo Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mo Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mo Chen. The network helps show where Mo Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mo Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mo Chen Line = papers co-authored together Mo Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010270
2 202054
3 201652
4 201741
5 201826
6 202022
7 202221
8 201619
9 201619
10 201111
11 202110
12 201510
13 20216
14 20236
15
Consumers Purchase Decisions and Affecting Factors on Organic Food
20136
16 20205
17 20244
18 20243
19 20163
20 20251

About Mo Chen

Mo Chen is a scholar working on Plant Science, Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Strategy and Management and Food Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic Food and Agriculture (7 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (5 papers), Global Energy Security and Policy (2 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (2 papers), International Business and FDI (2 papers), Water Treatment and Disinfection (2 papers) and Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (260 citations), Business and International Management (21 citations), Food Science (169 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (14 citations) and Plant Science (262 citations). Mo Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, Estonia and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Shijiu Yin, Linhai Wu, Yingjun Xu, Yiqin Wang, Yusheng Chen, Junfu Wei, Wendong Yang, Ziyi Li, Yue Zhang and Zhijian Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as British Food Journal, Aquaculture, Frontiers in Public Health, Environmental Earth Sciences and Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact