Ming‐Jim Yang

11 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

Ming‐Jim Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Emergency Medicine 95
  • Reproductive Medicine 43
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 103
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 17
  • Surgery 133
Replace Tomika Ludaway with:
Tomika Ludaway United States
Rivka Lederman United States
Lukas Schwake Germany
Naoki Nishimoto Japan
Wei Gu China
Lynne M Bang New Zealand
Marin Nishimura United States
Marilyn L. Scott United States
Håkan Olsson Denmark
Federico Fazio Italy
Ming‐Jim Yang relative to Tomika Ludaway United States Tomika Ludaway's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Tomika Ludaway · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Jim Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Jim Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Jim Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Jim Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Jim Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Jim Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Jim Yang. The network helps show where Ming‐Jim Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Jim Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Jim Yang Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Jim Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201463
2 201859
3 200641
4 202141
5 201338
6 200636
7 201619
8 201316
9 200716
10 200710
11 20181

About Ming‐Jim Yang

Ming‐Jim Yang is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Epidemiology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers), Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (2 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers) and Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (95 citations), Reproductive Medicine (43 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (103 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (17 citations) and Surgery (133 citations). Ming‐Jim Yang has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include Ghalib Jibara, Spiros Hiotis, Daniel M. Labow, Parissa Tabrizian, Umut Sarpel, Alan Garfinkel, Brian Shrager, James N. Weiss, Zhilin Qu and Anya Romanoff. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact