Thomas Biel

743 citations
22 papers · 562 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 4
    • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 3
    • ATP Synthase and ATPases Research 2

Thomas Biel

22 papers receiving 558 citations

Peers

Thomas Biel
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 57
  • Hematology 130
  • Genetics 96
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 109
  • Cell Biology 78
Replace Angelical Martin with:
Angelical Martin United States
Youming Guo United States
Michael Johns United States
Ameen A. Salahudeen United States
Trevor P. Fidler United States
Yufu Zhou China
Dominique Lautier France
C. Loesberg Netherlands
Karthigayan Shanmugasundaram United States
Yoko Hirabayashi Japan
Thomas Biel relative to Angelical Martin United States Angelical Martin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Angelical Martin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Biel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Biel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Biel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Biel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Biel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Biel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Biel. The network helps show where Thomas Biel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Biel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Biel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Biel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015179
2 201593
3 201859
4 201658
5 201338
6 201729
7 201723
8 202021
9 201818
10 201912
11 20229
12 20225
13 20244
14 20233
15 20242
16 20252
17 20252
18 20241
19 20191
20 20221

About Thomas Biel

Thomas Biel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Epidemiology, Cell Biology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 562 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (5 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (4 papers), Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (3 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (2 papers) and 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (57 citations), Hematology (130 citations), Genetics (96 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (109 citations) and Cell Biology (78 citations). Thomas Biel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include V. Ashutosh Rao, Toshiyuki Fukada, Chia‐Yu Wang, Mitchell D. Knutson, Alan Chan, Jae‐Sung Kim, Shintaro Hojyo, Wei Zhang, Supak Jenkitkasemwong and Richard Coffey. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Cancer Research, Cell Metabolism, ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact