Thomas Biel

763 citations
22 papers · 597 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Biel

22 papers receiving 591 citations

Peers

Thomas Biel
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 51
  • Hematology 137
  • Genetics 91
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 115
  • Cell Biology 76
Replace Angelical Martin with:
Angelical Martin United States
Prachi Umbarkar United States
C. Loesberg Netherlands
Trevor P. Fidler United States
N. Oreiro Spain
Yoko Hirabayashi Japan
Michael Johns United States
Diana Choi Canada
Joon‐Khim Loh Taiwan
Thomas Biel relative to Angelical Martin United States Angelical Martin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Angelical Martin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Biel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Biel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Biel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Biel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Biel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Biel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Biel. The network helps show where Thomas Biel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Biel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Biel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Biel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015192
2 201598
3 201660
4 201859
5 201340
6 201731
7 201726
8 202021
9 201819
10 201912
11 202210
12 20226
13 20245
14 20255
15 20234
16 20242
17 20252
18 20161
19 20221
20 20241

About Thomas Biel

Thomas Biel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Epidemiology, Cell Biology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (5 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (4 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (3 papers), Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (3 papers), Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (2 papers) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (51 citations), Hematology (137 citations), Genetics (91 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (115 citations) and Cell Biology (76 citations). Thomas Biel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include V. Ashutosh Rao, Mitchell D. Knutson, Wei Zhang, Toshiyuki Fukada, Chia‐Yu Wang, Jae‐Sung Kim, Supak Jenkitkasemwong, Richard Coffey, Shintaro Hojyo and Alan Chan. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Cancer Research, Cell Death and Differentiation, Cell Metabolism and Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact