Miles Bore

1.9k citations
41 papers · 1.4k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Miles Bore

41 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Miles Bore
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Clinical Psychology 440
  • Family Practice 32
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 426
  • Social Psychology 288
  • Applied Psychology 62
Replace Jelle Prins with:
Jelle Prins Netherlands
Douglas Farnill Australia
Erik Falkum Norway
Thomas W. Miller United States
David J. Lick United States
Jakob Håkansson Eklund Sweden
Mollie A. Ruben United States
Paul M. Spengler United States
Emma J. Stodel Canada
Paul D. Werner United States
Miles Bore relative to Jelle Prins Netherlands Jelle Prins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Jelle Prins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Miles Bore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Miles Bore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miles Bore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miles Bore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Miles Bore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miles Bore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miles Bore. The network helps show where Miles Bore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Miles Bore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Miles Bore Line = papers co-authored together Miles Bore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007136
2 2005102
3 201696
4 200590
5 200981
6 201673
7 201259
8 201757
9 201655
10 201848
11 201547
12 200543
13 201239
14 201239
15 201135
16 201235
17 200531
18 200129
19 200928
20 200727

About Miles Bore

Miles Bore is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Education and Admissions (16 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (8 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (4 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (4 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (440 citations), Family Practice (32 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (426 citations), Social Psychology (288 citations) and Applied Psychology (62 citations). Miles Bore has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Don Munro, David Powis, Balakrishnan Nair, Brian Kelly, Mary Ann Lumsden, Heather Douglas, Ian Kerridge, Keith Millar, Jean McKendree and Felicity Harris. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, Medical Education, Personality and Individual Differences, BMJ Open and BMC Medical Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact