Mike O’Neil

23 papers receiving 417 citations

Peers

Mike O’Neil
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Health Information Management 64
  • Family Practice 8
  • Artificial Intelligence 161
  • Anatomy 6
  • Orthodontics 16
Replace Edward Pattison-Gordon with:
Edward Pattison-Gordon United States
Charles Sneiderman United States
Angelo Rossi Mori Italy
Domenico M. Pisanelli Italy
Else Nygren Sweden
Josef Schepers Germany
Grahame Grieve United States
Josef Ingenerf Germany
Maria Chiara Pettenati Italy
Rolf Engelbrecht Germany
Mike O’Neil relative to Edward Pattison-Gordon United States Edward Pattison-Gordon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.3×
Edward Pattison-Gordon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mike O’Neil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mike O’Neil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike O’Neil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike O’Neil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mike O’Neil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike O’Neil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike O’Neil. The network helps show where Mike O’Neil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mike O’Neil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mike O’Neil Line = papers co-authored together Mike O’Neil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995130
2 201446
3 199035
4 199634
5 199031
6 201229
7 199322
8 198919
9 199818
10 199815
11 201015
12 198913
13
Anatomical characterisation of surgical procedures in the Read Thesaurus.
199612
14 199412
15
The Read Thesaurus--creation and beyond.
19977
16 19917
17 20155
18 19903
19 19902
20 19902

About Mike O’Neil

Mike O’Neil is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Education, Health Information Management and Language and Linguistics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (7 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (6 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (5 papers), linguistics and terminology studies (3 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (3 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (3 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (2 papers) and Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (64 citations), Family Practice (8 citations), Artificial Intelligence (161 citations), Anatomy (6 citations) and Orthodontics (16 citations). Mike O’Neil has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Andrzej Glowinski, John Fox, C.J. Price, Peter Sanderson, Len Hand, Balvinder Khambay, J.C. Barbenel, Colin Gordon, Ashraf Ayoub and Xiangyang Ju. Their work appears in journals such as Methods of Information in Medicine, Phytochemistry, Accounting Education, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact