Michela Cozza

32 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Michela Cozza
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 23
  • Human-Computer Interaction 61
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 47
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 15
  • Demography 63
Replace Kim Sawchuk with:
Kim Sawchuk Canada
Godwin Y. Agboka United States
Thomas M. Cavanagh United States
Sean Sturm New Zealand
Theodore Panitz United States
Olivier Wathelet France
Sangpil Han South Korea
Stephan Sonnenburg Austria
Stephan Schumann Germany
Christina Wasson United States
Michela Cozza relative to Kim Sawchuk Canada Kim Sawchuk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kim Sawchuk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michela Cozza

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michela Cozza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michela Cozza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michela Cozza more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michela Cozza

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michela Cozza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michela Cozza. The network helps show where Michela Cozza may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michela Cozza, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michela Cozza Line = papers co-authored together Michela Cozza links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201841
2 201737
3 201835
4 202028
5 201119
6 201718
7 201614
8 202113
9 202312
10 201910
11 202310
12 202310
13 202110
14 20186
15
Understanding Motivations in Designing for Older Adults
20166
16 20235
17 20235
18 20235
19 20214
20 20223

About Michela Cozza

Michela Cozza is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction, Management of Technology and Innovation, Demography and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 35 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (10 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (8 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (7 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (6 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (3 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers) and Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (23 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (61 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (47 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (15 citations) and Demography (63 citations). Michela Cozza has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Silvia Gherardi, Antonella De Angeli, Lucia Crevani, Anette Hallin, Barbara Poggio, Angelo Benozzo, Neil Carey, Carol Taylor, Nikki Fairchild and Mirka Koro‐Ljungberg. Their work appears in journals such as Gender Work and Organization, Culture and Organization, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, The Learning Organization and Health Sociology Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact