Michela Cozza

32 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Michela Cozza
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 23
  • Human-Computer Interaction 61
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 47
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 14
  • Demography 64
Replace Sean Sturm with:
Sean Sturm New Zealand
Päivi Rasi Finland
Thomas M. Cavanagh United States
Theodore Panitz United States
Godwin Y. Agboka United States
Sangpil Han South Korea
Stephan Sonnenburg Austria
Stephan Schumann Germany
Christina Wasson United States
Kathleen Schreurs Canada
Michela Cozza relative to Sean Sturm New Zealand Sean Sturm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.5×
Sean Sturm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michela Cozza

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michela Cozza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michela Cozza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michela Cozza more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michela Cozza

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michela Cozza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michela Cozza. The network helps show where Michela Cozza may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michela Cozza, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michela Cozza Line = papers co-authored together Michela Cozza links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201841
2 201737
3 201835
4 202028
5 201119
6 201718
7 202318
8 201615
9 202114
10 202312
11 202110
12 202310
13 201910
14 20237
15 20236
16
Understanding Motivations in Designing for Older Adults
20166
17 20185
18 20235
19 20224
20 20214

About Michela Cozza

Michela Cozza is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Management of Technology and Innovation, Demography, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (10 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (8 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (7 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (6 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (3 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (3 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (23 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (61 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (47 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (14 citations) and Demography (64 citations). Michela Cozza has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Silvia Gherardi, Antonella De Angeli, Lucia Crevani, Anette Hallin, Barbara Poggio, Nikki Fairchild, Neil Carey, Angelo Benozzo, Carol Taylor and Mirka Koro‐Ljungberg. Their work appears in journals such as Gender Work and Organization, Futures, The Learning Organization, Gender Technology and Development and Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact