The Learning Organization

1.0k papers and 19.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in The Learning Organization in the last decades have received a total of 19.3k indexed citations. Papers published in The Learning Organization usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (579 papers), Strategy and Management (451 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (237 papers) specifically the topics of Organizational Learning and Leadership (404 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (387 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (194 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Learning Organization are Anders Örtenblad, Peter A.C. Smith, Ortrun Zuber‐Skerritt, Mike Pedler, Swee C. Goh, Ashok Jashapara, David Deakins, Mark Freel, Silvia Gherardi and Jacob Brix.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Learning Organization

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Learning Organization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Learning Organization.

Countries where authors publish in The Learning Organization

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Learning Organization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Learning Organization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Learning Organization more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025