Michel Croce

508 citations
24 papers · 228 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Michel Croce

19 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers

Michel Croce
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Philosophy 108
  • Family Practice 7
  • Health Informatics 4
  • Information Systems and Management 21
  • History and Philosophy of Science 13
Replace Joseph W. Koterski with:
Joseph W. Koterski United States
Jennifer M. Morton United States
Maria Baghramian Ireland
Matthew Lindauer United States
Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka United States
Torill Strand Norway
Mark van Roojen United States
Mark Okrent United States
Myisha Cherry United States
Thomas D. Fallace United States
Michel Croce relative to Joseph W. Koterski United States Joseph W. Koterski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Joseph W. Koterski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michel Croce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michel Croce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michel Croce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michel Croce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michel Croce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michel Croce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michel Croce. The network helps show where Michel Croce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Michel Croce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michel Croce Line = papers co-authored together Michel Croce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201744
2 201937
3 201735
4 201828
5 202020
6 201811
7 201910
8 20198
9 20218
10 20246
11 20196
12 20244
13 20253
14
Civility in the Post-truth Age: An Aristotelian Account
20213
15
Il potenziale educativo degli esemplari intellettuali
20181
16 20251
17 20251
18 20221
19
La riscoperta dell'umiltà come virtù relazionale: la risposta della tradizione ai problemi contemporanei
20141
20
Etica delle virtu. Un'introduzione
20170

About Michel Croce

Michel Croce is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, General Health Professions and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 228 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Digital Education and Society (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (108 citations), Family Practice (7 citations), Health Informatics (4 citations), Information Systems and Management (21 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (13 citations). Michel Croce has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Maria Baghramian, Tommaso Piazza, Neri Marsili, R. Brunetti, Filippo Domaneschi and Mario De. Their work appears in journals such as Social Epistemology, Philosophy Compass, Episteme, Journal of Moral Education and The Philosophical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact