Matthew Lindauer
Impact in
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Free Will and Agency
- Philosophy top 5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Papers in
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 9
- Free Will and Agency 2
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 7
- Co-authors
- Christian Barry (2 shared papers)Gerhard Øverland (1 shared paper)Daniel Västfjäll (2 shared papers)Marcus Mayorga (2 shared papers)Joshua D. Greene (2 shared papers)Paul Slovic (2 shared papers)Peter Singer (1 shared paper)Justin Bruner (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (3 papers)Review of Philosophy and Psychology (2 papers)Res Publica (1 paper)Judgment and Decision Making (1 paper)Journal of Moral Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaSweden
In The Last Decade
Matthew Lindauer
12 papers receiving 184 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Cognitive Neuroscience 100
- Philosophy 52
- General Decision Sciences 8
- Information Systems and Management 26
- Safety Research 26
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Lindauer
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Lindauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Lindauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Lindauer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Lindauer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Lindauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Lindauer. The network helps show where Matthew Lindauer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Lindauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 99 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 0 |
About Matthew Lindauer
Matthew Lindauer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations, Information Systems and Management, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 196 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (5 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (100 citations), Philosophy (52 citations), General Decision Sciences (8 citations), Information Systems and Management (26 citations) and Safety Research (26 citations). Matthew Lindauer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Christian Barry, Gerhard Øverland, Daniel Västfjäll, Marcus Mayorga, Joshua D. Greene, Paul Slovic, Peter Singer, Justin Bruner, Carissa Véliz and Nicholas Southwood. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, Res Publica, Judgment and Decision Making and Journal of Moral Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.