Mark Okrent

516 citations
15 papers · 172 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
    • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 2
    • Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity 1
    • Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 1
    • Critical Theory and Philosophy 2

Mark Okrent

14 papers receiving 145 citations

Peers

Mark Okrent
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Philosophy 85
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 64
  • General Psychology 5
  • History and Philosophy of Science 17
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 25
Replace Gail Soffer with:
Gail Soffer United States
William Blattner United States
Frederick Stoutland United States
Daniel Breazeale United States
Vladimir Jankélévitch
Joseph W. Koterski United States
Aaron Z. Zimmerman United States
Eugen Fink Brazil
Hiram Caton Australia
Hugo Meynell United Kingdom
Mark Okrent relative to Gail Soffer United States Gail Soffer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gail Soffer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Okrent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Okrent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Okrent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Okrent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Okrent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Okrent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Okrent. The network helps show where Mark Okrent may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Mark Okrent, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Okrent Line = papers co-authored together Mark Okrent links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 199365
2 199026
3 199119
4
Rational Animals: The Teleological Roots of Intentionality
200713
5 199910
6 20027
7 20007
8
Nature and Normativity: Biology, Teleology, and Meaning
20176
9 19846
10 20176
11 19813
12
Why the mind isn't a program (But some digital computer might have a mind)
19962
13 19841
14 19911
15 19800

About Mark Okrent

Mark Okrent is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 172 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (2 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (1 paper) and Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (85 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (64 citations), General Psychology (5 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (17 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (25 citations). Mark Okrent has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Hubert L. Dreyfus, Dorothea Frede, Albert Borgmann, John Sallis, Simon Critchley, John D. Caputo, Françoise Dastur, Mark A. Wrathall, William Blattner and James E. Faulconer. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Inquiry, The Monist, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Philosophical Topics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact