Michaela Wolf

1.3k citations
56 papers · 525 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Michaela Wolf

44 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers

Michaela Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Language and Linguistics 386
  • Linguistics and Language 43
  • General Health Professions 148
  • Literature and Literary Theory 58
  • Anthropology 47
Replace Luc van Doorslaer with:
Luc van Doorslaer Belgium
Edwin Gentzler United States
Moira Inghilleri United Kingdom
Rakefet Sela‐Sheffy Israel
Luise von Flotow Canada
Hilary Footitt United Kingdom
Itamar Even‐Zohar Israel
Harish Trivedi India
Emer O’Sullivan Germany
Zohar Shavit Israel
Michaela Wolf relative to Luc van Doorslaer Belgium Luc van Doorslaer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Luc van Doorslaer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michaela Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michaela Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaela Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaela Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michaela Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaela Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaela Wolf. The network helps show where Michaela Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Michaela Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michaela Wolf Line = papers co-authored together Michaela Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007102
2 201148
3 201046
4 201237
5 201824
6 200423
7 200723
8 199920
9 199719
10 201418
11 201517
12 200615
13 201015
14 201214
15 201712
16
Interference from the Third Space? The Construction of Cultural Identity through Translation
200811
17 20147
18
The female state of the art: Women in the “translation field”
20067
19 20126
20 20145

About Michaela Wolf

Michaela Wolf is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, General Health Professions, Literature and Literary Theory, Law and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 56 papers that have together received 525 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Translation Studies and Practices (31 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (10 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (6 papers), linguistics and terminology studies (5 papers), Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), European Cultural and National Identity (4 papers), Legal Language and Interpretation (3 papers) and Gender Studies in Language (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (386 citations), Linguistics and Language (43 citations), General Health Professions (148 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (58 citations) and Anthropology (47 citations). Michaela Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Brazil and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Nadja Grbić. Their work appears in journals such as Target International Journal of Translation Studies, Translation and Interpreting Studies, Internationales Archiv für Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur, International Journal of the Sociology of Language and MonTi Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact