Michael Witmore

18 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers

Michael Witmore
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Literature and Literary Theory 124
  • General Social Sciences 20
  • Geography, Planning and Development 29
  • Classics 13
  • History 32
Replace Katherine Bode with:
Katherine Bode Australia
Nicholas Dames United States
Andrew Piper Canada
Ray Siemens Canada
Willard McCarty United Kingdom
Fotis Jannidis Germany
Julia Flanders United States
Jeffrey T. Schnapp United States
Ruth Ahnert United Kingdom
Laurence Raw Türkiye
Michael Witmore relative to Katherine Bode Australia Katherine Bode's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Katherine Bode · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Witmore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Witmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Witmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Witmore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Witmore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Witmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Witmore. The network helps show where Michael Witmore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Michael Witmore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Witmore Line = papers co-authored together Michael Witmore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201474
2 200157
3 201151
4 201040
5
Culture of Accidents: Unexpected Knowledges in Early Modern England
200135
6 201524
7 201316
8 20124
9 20144
10 20073
11 20023
12 20163
13 20123
14 20102
15
Phenomenology and Sensation : Shakespeare, Sensation, and Renaissance Existentialism
20122
16 20171
17 20191
18 20141
19
Shakespeare's Inner Music
20101
20
The professional and linguistic communities of early modern dramatists
20160

About Michael Witmore

Michael Witmore is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Artificial Intelligence, History and Philosophy of Science, History and Anthropology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Authorship Attribution and Profiling (4 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (3 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (3 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (3 papers), History of Medicine Studies (2 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers) and Historical Influence and Diplomacy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (124 citations), General Social Sciences (20 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (29 citations), Classics (13 citations) and History (32 citations). Michael Witmore has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Hope, Michael Gleicher, Franco Moretti, Matthew L. Jockers, David Loewenstein and Anupam Basu. Their work appears in journals such as postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies, Shakespeare Quarterly, New Literary History, Criticism and Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact