Andrew Piper

815 citations
50 papers · 369 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew Piper

42 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Andrew Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • General Social Sciences 74
  • Literature and Literary Theory 111
  • Artificial Intelligence 141
  • Communication 25
  • Geography, Planning and Development 17
Replace Fotis Jannidis with:
Fotis Jannidis Germany
Katherine Bode Australia
Suma Desu United States
T. Meder Netherlands
Maria Antoniak United States
Annette Hautli-Janisz Germany
Justin Garten United States
Kenneth Reinecke Hansen Denmark
Fabian Prochazka Germany
Andrew P. Carlin Macao
Andrew Piper relative to Fotis Jannidis Germany Fotis Jannidis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Fotis Jannidis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Piper. The network helps show where Andrew Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Piper Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201842
2
Enumerations: Data and Literary Study
201840
3 202137
4 201531
5 201530
6 202022
7 201316
8 201915
9 201614
10 201710
11
Distant Readings: Topologies of German Culture in the Long Nineteenth Century
20149
12 20168
13 20167
14 20217
15
Studying Literary Characters and Character Networks.
20176
16 20236
17 20196
18
Annotating characters in literary corpora: a scheme, the CHARLES tool, and an annotated novel
20165
19 20165
20 20194

About Andrew Piper

Andrew Piper is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, General Social Sciences and Communication, having authored 50 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (13 papers), Topic Modeling (11 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (8 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (8 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (7 papers), Authorship Attribution and Profiling (5 papers), Digital Games and Media (5 papers) and Translation Studies and Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Social Sciences (74 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (111 citations), Artificial Intelligence (141 citations), Communication (25 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (17 citations). Andrew Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Derek Ruths, Richard Jean So, David Bamman, David Jurgens, Philippe Mongeon, Fei Shu, Vincent Larivière, Olivier Toubia, Mark Algee‐Hewitt and David Hobson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, New Literary History, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, Poetics and Sustainability Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact