Countries where authors publish in English Language Notes
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in English Language Notes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in English Language Notes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites English Language Notes more than expected).
Fields of papers published in English Language Notes
This network shows the impact of papers published in English Language Notes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in English Language Notes.
About English Language Notes
The 417 papers published in English Language Notes in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations . Papers published in English Language Notes usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (117 papers), Classics (22 papers), Cultural Studies (42 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (23 papers) and History (41 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval Literature and History (17 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (14 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (14 papers), Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (14 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (13 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (13 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (12 papers) and Modernist Literature and Criticism (11 papers). The most active scholars publishing in English Language Notes are Kyle Powys Whyte, Elizabeth DeLoughrey, Isabel Hofmeyr, Alan Liu, Raymond B. Waddington, Daniel J. Donoghue, Lindsey Dillon, Julie Sze, Jennifer A. Wenzel and Meg Samuelson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.