Michael Correll

46 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Michael Correll
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 822
  • General Decision Sciences 47
  • Signal Processing 131
  • Computer Science Applications 64
  • Human-Computer Interaction 65
Replace Caroline Ziemkiewicz with:
Caroline Ziemkiewicz United States
Lane Harrison United States
Anastasia Bezerianos France
Enrico Bertini United States
Luana Micallef Finland
Geoffrey Ellis United Kingdom
Jessica Hullman United States
Leanna House United States
Dominik Moritz United States
Fanny Chevalier Canada
Michael Correll relative to Caroline Ziemkiewicz United States Caroline Ziemkiewicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Caroline Ziemkiewicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Correll

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Correll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Correll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Correll more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Correll

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Correll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Correll. The network helps show where Michael Correll may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Correll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Correll Line = papers co-authored together Michael Correll links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018238
2 2014178
3 2018115
4 201478
5 201378
6 201256
7 201854
8 201842
9 201741
10 202035
11 201133
12 201431
13 201630
14 201927
15 201125
16 202324
17 201422
18 201922
19 201721
20 201620

About Michael Correll

Michael Correll is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing and Ecological Modeling, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (32 papers), Data Analysis with R (12 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers), Image and Video Quality Assessment (4 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (4 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (3 papers), Data Quality and Management (3 papers) and Statistics Education and Methodologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (822 citations), General Decision Sciences (47 citations), Signal Processing (131 citations), Computer Science Applications (64 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (65 citations). Michael Correll has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael Gleicher, Jeffrey Heer, Melanie Tory, Alper Sarıkaya, Danyel Fisher, Lyn Bartram, Danielle Albers, Steven Franconeri, Matthew Kay and Jessica Hullman. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Computer Graphics Forum, Journal of Virology, Bioinformatics and Journal of Vision.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact