This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Criticism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Criticism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Criticism more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Criticism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Criticism.
About Criticism
The 1.0k papers published in Criticism in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Criticism usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (413 papers), Music (54 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (75 papers), Classics (46 papers) and History (126 papers) specifically the topics of Poetry Analysis and Criticism (86 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (81 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (66 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (58 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (46 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (45 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (33 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Criticism are Fred Moten, Thomas Leitch, Richard A. Grusin, Michael V. Rothberg, Heather K. Love, Vanessa Agnew, Alexander B. Cook, Robert S. Lehman, Catherine Rottenberg and Richard Johnson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.