Michael Thees
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 2%
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
-
- Augmented Reality Applications
Papers in
-
- Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes 7
-
- Augmented Reality Applications 5
- Co-authors
- Jochen Kühn (13 shared papers)Sebastian Kapp (9 shared papers)Martin P. Strzys (4 shared papers)Fabian Beil (4 shared papers)Paul Lukowicz (1 shared paper)Roland Brünken (3 shared papers)Sarah Malone (3 shared papers)Paul Lukowicz (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Michael Thees
14 papers receiving 487 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Human-Computer Interaction 210
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 284
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 109
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 108
- Information Systems 149
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Thees
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Thees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Thees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Thees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Thees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Thees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Thees. The network helps show where Michael Thees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Thees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 226 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 116 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 1 |
About Michael Thees
Michael Thees is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Media Technology and Education, having authored 14 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (7 papers), Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies (6 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (5 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (4 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (2 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (210 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (284 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (109 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (108 citations) and Information Systems (149 citations). Michael Thees has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Czechia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Jochen Kühn, Sebastian Kapp, Martin P. Strzys, Fabian Beil, Paul Lukowicz, Roland Brünken, Sarah Malone, Paul Lukowicz, Pascal Klein and Albrecht Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Computers in Human Behavior, British Journal of Educational Technology, The Physics Teacher and European Journal of Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.