Michael Tedeschi

15 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

Michael Tedeschi
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Family Practice 18
  • Biological Psychiatry 17
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 67
  • Pharmacology 73
  • Social Psychology 82
Replace Xue‐Jin Hu with:
Xue‐Jin Hu China
Judith A. Callan United States
Sean Kennedy United States
Alessa von Wolff Germany
Mônica Zavaloni Scalco Canada
Dominique Milea France
Stephen B. Woolley United States
Alison Burns United Kingdom
Steven C. Stoner United States
Klaas M. L. Huijbregts Netherlands
Michael Tedeschi relative to Xue‐Jin Hu China Xue‐Jin Hu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Xue‐Jin Hu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Tedeschi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Tedeschi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Tedeschi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Tedeschi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Tedeschi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Tedeschi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Tedeschi. The network helps show where Michael Tedeschi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Michael Tedeschi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Tedeschi Line = papers co-authored together Michael Tedeschi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2006317
2 201815
3 201815
4 201914
5 202014
6 200610
7 20216
8 20184
9 20224
10
Naltrexone and acamprosate. Using new drugs for alcohol dependence.
20013
11
Student's viewpoint. The response of patients to students observing general practice.
19783
12
Chronic nonmalignant pain - the rational use of opioid medication.
20063
13 20233
14 20012
15 20172
16
Naltrexone for opioid dependence. An additional tool for general practitioners.
20020

About Michael Tedeschi

Michael Tedeschi is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Geophysics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (1 paper), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (18 citations), Biological Psychiatry (17 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (67 citations), Pharmacology (73 citations) and Social Psychology (82 citations). Michael Tedeschi has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Guyana. Frequent co-authors include George J. Wan, Mark Olfson, Steven C. Marcus, Steffen Gerd Hagemann, James Davis, Paul A Maguire, Noreen Joyce Evans, Jeffrey CL Looi, Malcolm Roberts and Daniel Bonner. Their work appears in journals such as Economic Geology, Medical Teacher, Gastroenterology, Precambrian Research and Current Medical Research and Opinion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact