Michael Tedeschi
Impact in
- Family Practice top 5%
Papers in
-
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 3
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 2
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 4
- Health and Medical Research Impacts 2
- Co-authors
- George J. Wan (2 shared papers)Steven C. Marcus (1 shared paper)Mark Olfson (1 shared paper)David Hackett (1 shared paper)Paul A Maguire (7 shared papers)Daniel Bonner (7 shared papers)Rebecca E Reay (7 shared papers)Jeffrey CL Looi (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- Current Medical Research and Opinion (1 paper)American Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)Gastroenterology (1 paper)Medical Teacher (1 paper)Australasian Psychiatry (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Michael Tedeschi
13 papers receiving 338 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Family Practice 39
- Biological Psychiatry 23
- Psychiatry and Mental health 138
- Pharmacology 116
- Social Psychology 125
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Tedeschi
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Tedeschi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Tedeschi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Tedeschi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Tedeschi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Tedeschi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Tedeschi. The network helps show where Michael Tedeschi may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Michael Tedeschi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 307 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 6 | Naltrexone and acamprosate. Using new drugs for alcohol dependence. | 2001 | 3 |
| 7 | Student's viewpoint. The response of patients to students observing general practice. | 1978 | 3 |
| 8 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 9 | Chronic nonmalignant pain - the rational use of opioid medication. | 2006 | 3 |
| 10 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 1 |
About Michael Tedeschi
Michael Tedeschi is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, Pharmacology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (39 citations), Biological Psychiatry (23 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (138 citations), Pharmacology (116 citations) and Social Psychology (125 citations). Michael Tedeschi has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include George J. Wan, Steven C. Marcus, Mark Olfson, David Hackett, Paul A Maguire, Daniel Bonner, Rebecca E Reay, Jeffrey CL Looi, Trent P. McLaughlin and David Kramer. Their work appears in journals such as Current Medical Research and Opinion, American Journal of Psychiatry, Gastroenterology, Medical Teacher and Australasian Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.