Australasian Psychiatry

2.8k papers and 22.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in Australasian Psychiatry in the last decades have received a total of 22.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Australasian Psychiatry usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.2k papers), General Health Professions (783 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (633 papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health Treatment and Access (381 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (349 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (285 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australasian Psychiatry are Saxby Pridmore, Ian B. Hickie, David Castle, Jeffrey CL Looi, Garry Walter, Patrick D. McGorry, Ernest Hunter, Vladan Starčević, Christopher Ryan and Edmond Chiu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australasian Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australasian Psychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australasian Psychiatry.

Countries where authors publish in Australasian Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australasian Psychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australasian Psychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australasian Psychiatry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025