Michael Neill

1.1k citations
39 papers · 291 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Neill

22 papers receiving 121 citations

Peers

Michael Neill
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Literature and Literary Theory 151
  • Classics 27
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 34
  • History 63
  • Museology 20
Replace David Scott Kastan with:
David Scott Kastan United Kingdom
Graham Holderness United Kingdom
Katharine Eisaman Maus United States
R. A. Foakes United Kingdom
Dorothea Kehler United States
Louis Montrose United States
John A. Dussinger United States
Phyllis Rackin United States
Coppélia Kahn United States
Philip Sidney
Michael Neill relative to David Scott Kastan United Kingdom David Scott Kastan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
David Scott Kastan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Neill. The network helps show where Michael Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Michael Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Neill Line = papers co-authored together Michael Neill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199764
2 198942
3 199430
4 199828
5 199719
6 199718
7 199110
8 20088
9
The Selected Plays of John Marston
19868
10 19907
11 19967
12 19935
13 19985
14 19965
15 20144
16 19953
17 19973
18 19913
19 19802
20
Guerrillas and Gangs: Frantz Fanon and V. S. Naipaul
19822

About Michael Neill

Michael Neill is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Anthropology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (9 papers), Irish and British Studies (5 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers) and Early Modern Spanish Literature (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (151 citations), Classics (27 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (34 citations), History (63 citations) and Museology (20 citations). Michael Neill has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Patricia G. Parker, Virginia Mason Vaughan, John Kerrigan, MacDonald P. Jackson, John Marston, David Schalkwyk, Sara Steen, Aaron Miller, Byungik Chang and Susan Snyder. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, Renaissance Drama, The Modern Language Review, Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 and Notes and Queries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact