Michael Neill

1.1k citations
52 papers · 441 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Neill

32 papers receiving 191 citations

Peers

Michael Neill
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Literature and Literary Theory 217
  • Classics 38
  • History 98
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 43
  • Anthropology 82
Replace Graham Holderness with:
Graham Holderness United Kingdom
David Scott Kastan United States
John A. Dussinger United States
Dorothea Kehler United States
Hugh Grady United States
Michael D. Bristol United Kingdom
Sujata Iyengar United States
Robert Weimann United States
Robert S Miola United States
Natasha Korda United States
Michael Neill relative to Graham Holderness United Kingdom Graham Holderness's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Graham Holderness · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Neill. The network helps show where Michael Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Michael Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Neill Line = papers co-authored together Michael Neill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199775
2 198956
3 199750
4 199849
5 199444
6 199724
7 199317
8 199111
9
The Selected Plays of John Marston
198611
10 200810
11 19907
12 19967
13 19787
14 19985
15 19965
16 20105
17 20094
18 20144
19 20074
20 19974

About Michael Neill

Michael Neill is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Philosophy and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 52 papers that have together received 441 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (16 papers), Irish and British Studies (7 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (2 papers) and Early Modern Spanish Literature (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (217 citations), Classics (38 citations), History (98 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (43 citations) and Anthropology (82 citations). Michael Neill has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patricia G. Parker, MacDonald P. Jackson, John Marston, Virginia Mason Vaughan, John Kerrigan, Sara Steen, Byungik Chang, Roy Issa, Aaron Miller and David Schalkwyk. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, Renaissance Drama, The Modern Language Review, Notes and Queries and Studies in English Literature 1500-1900.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact