Michael Lee Thomas

139 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Michael Lee Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 178
  • Applied Psychology 182
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 460
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 575
  • Clinical Psychology 598
Replace Nicholas R. Eaton with:
Nicholas R. Eaton United States
Xiangfei Meng China
Frederick L. Coolidge United States
Stephen G. Post United States
Kaufmann Tobias Norway
Paul Benjamin Badcock Australia
Kiyotaka Nemoto Japan
Jeffrey H. Boyd United States
Tobias Großmann Germany
Tom Booth United Kingdom
Michael Lee Thomas relative to Nicholas R. Eaton United States Nicholas R. Eaton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.9×
Nicholas R. Eaton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Lee Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Lee Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Lee Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Lee Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Lee Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Lee Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Lee Thomas. The network helps show where Michael Lee Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Lee Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Lee Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Michael Lee Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 153 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010230
2 2004175
3 2016151
4 2021148
5 2015116
6 202096
7 199990
8 201784
9 202178
10 201575
11 202174
12 199972
13 202368
14 200164
15 201964
16 201758
17 199958
18 199756
19 202055
20 201150

About Michael Lee Thomas

Michael Lee Thomas is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 153 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (15 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (13 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (10 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (10 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (178 citations), Applied Psychology (182 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (460 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (575 citations) and Clinical Psychology (598 citations). Michael Lee Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Dilip V. Jeste, Gregory A. Light, Yash B. Joshi, Neal R. Swerdlow, Barton W. Palmer, R. Carminati, J. Ricardo Arias‐Gonzalez, Jean‐Jacques Greffet, Ellen Lee and Juan L. Molina. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Psychological Assessment, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Journal of Psychiatric Research and Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact