Stephen G. Post

4.8k citations
142 papers · 3.4k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen G. Post

136 papers receiving 3k citations

Peers

Stephen G. Post
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Health 565
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 776
  • Aging 52
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 81
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 678
Replace Daniela S. Jopp with:
Daniela S. Jopp Switzerland
Ingrid Waldron United States
Jayne C. Lucke Australia
Sanna Read United Kingdom
Mirka Hintsanen Finland
Rocío Fernández Ballesteros Spain
Jennie G. Noll United States
David A. Sbarra United States
Lennart Nordenfelt Sweden
Nicole Valtorta United Kingdom
Stephen G. Post relative to Daniela S. Jopp Switzerland Daniela S. Jopp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Daniela S. Jopp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen G. Post

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen G. Post's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen G. Post with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen G. Post more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen G. Post

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen G. Post. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen G. Post. The network helps show where Stephen G. Post may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen G. Post, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen G. Post Line = papers co-authored together Stephen G. Post links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 142 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005523
2 1992377
3 2000329
4 2002128
5 1995108
6 200496
7 199782
8 200377
9 200073
10 201964
11 200362
12 201461
13 201360
14
The Fountain of Youth: Cultural, Scientific and Ethical Perspectives on a Biomedical Goal
200447
15 201146
16 199445
17 200345
18 200141
19 201540
20 199839

About Stephen G. Post

Stephen G. Post is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, General Health Professions and Philosophy, having authored 142 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and bioethics in healthcare (39 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (31 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (16 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (15 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (12 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (8 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (565 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (776 citations), Aging (52 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (81 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (678 citations). Stephen G. Post has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter John Whitehouse, Christina M. Puchalski, David B. Larson, Robert H. Binstock, Maria E. Pagano, Matthew T. Lee, Lynn G. Underwood, William B. Hurlbut, Jeffrey P. Schloss and Jeff Levin. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, The Hastings Center Report, JAMA, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact