Stephen G. Post

125 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Stephen G. Post
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Health 605
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 84
  • Aging 64
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 459
  • Clinical Psychology 574
Replace Dana A. Glei with:
Dana A. Glei United States
Jayne Lucke Australia
Belinda L. Needham United States
Mathias Lasgaard Denmark
Laura Pulkki-Råbäck Finland
Richard A. Miech United States
Daniela S. Jopp Switzerland
Benjamin P. Chapman United States
Keith E. Whitfield United States
Louise Lafortune United Kingdom
Stephen G. Post relative to Dana A. Glei United States Dana A. Glei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Dana A. Glei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen G. Post

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen G. Post's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen G. Post with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen G. Post more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen G. Post

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen G. Post. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen G. Post. The network helps show where Stephen G. Post may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen G. Post, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen G. Post Line = papers co-authored together Stephen G. Post links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005474
2 1992336
3 2000298
4 2002112
5 1995104
6 200488
7 200374
8 199770
9 200067
10 201957
11 201457
12 201346
13 200345
14 201144
15 200338
16 201537
17 200137
18 199436
19 199834
20 201433

About Stephen G. Post

Stephen G. Post is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 130 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (20 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (19 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (7 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (605 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (84 citations), Aging (64 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (459 citations) and Clinical Psychology (574 citations). Stephen G. Post has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Whitehouse, David B. Larson, Christina M. Puchalski, Maria E. Pagano, Robert H. Binstock, Matthew T. Lee, Lynn G. Underwood, Jeffrey P. Schloss, William B. Hurlbut and Byron R. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, The Hastings Center Report, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, JAMA and Perspectives in biology and medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact