Danielle Glorioso

3.5k citations
31 papers · 2.3k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Glorioso

30 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Danielle Glorioso
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 227
  • Clinical Psychology 821
  • Health 308
  • Biological Psychiatry 82
  • Applied Psychology 101
Replace Richard Schulz with:
Richard Schulz United States
Claudia Sikorski Germany
Cesare Turrina Italy
Els I. Brilman Netherlands
Elvira Lara Spain
Stacey Scott United States
Alejandro de la Torre‐Luque Spain
Farhana Mann United Kingdom
Ignacio Montorio Spain
Karen A. Ertel United States
Danielle Glorioso relative to Richard Schulz United States Richard Schulz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17×
Richard Schulz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Glorioso

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Glorioso's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Glorioso with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Glorioso more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Glorioso

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Glorioso. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Glorioso. The network helps show where Danielle Glorioso may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Glorioso, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Glorioso Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Glorioso links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007379
2 2012362
3 2018201
4 2012169
5 2016131
6
Suicide bereavement and complicated grief.
2012128
7 201699
8 201492
9 201588
10 201472
11 201766
12 200865
13 201659
14 201048
15 200947
16 202045
17 201938
18 201233
19 201931
20
Reformed consent: adapting to new media and research participant preferences.
200927

About Danielle Glorioso

Danielle Glorioso is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 31 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (5 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers) and Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (227 citations), Clinical Psychology (821 citations), Health (308 citations), Biological Psychiatry (82 citations) and Applied Psychology (101 citations). Danielle Glorioso has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Dilip V. Jeste, Barton W. Palmer, Colin A. Depp, Helena C. Kraemer, Averria Sirkin Martin, Shahrokh Golshan, Alana Iglewicz, Sidney Zisook, Ilanit Tal Young and Kathryn Seay. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Research, International Psychogeriatrics and Aging & Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact