Michael LaRocca

20 papers receiving 612 citations

Peers

Michael LaRocca
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 157
  • Information Systems and Management 104
  • Strategy and Management 180
  • Marketing 96
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10
Replace Kathi Miner‐Rubino with:
Kathi Miner‐Rubino United States
Allison Duke United States
Felipe Valentini Brazil
Daniel D. Goering United States
Zhenxing Gong China
Ding–Yu Jiang Taiwan
Robert J. Paul United States
Nicholas A. Smith United States
Rachel S. Rauvola United States
Katherine A. Sliter United States
Michael LaRocca relative to Kathi Miner‐Rubino United States Kathi Miner‐Rubino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Kathi Miner‐Rubino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael LaRocca

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael LaRocca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael LaRocca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael LaRocca more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael LaRocca

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael LaRocca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael LaRocca. The network helps show where Michael LaRocca may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael LaRocca, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael LaRocca Line = papers co-authored together Michael LaRocca links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2011250
2 201667
3 201157
4 201840
5 201540
6 201238
7 201636
8 201325
9 201519
10 201119
11 201417
12 201915
13 201815
14 20189
15 20218
16 20204
17 20193
18 20232
19 20231
20 20141

About Michael LaRocca

Michael LaRocca is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Information Systems and Management, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 666 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (5 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (2 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (2 papers) and Education and Military Integration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (157 citations), Information Systems and Management (104 citations), Strategy and Management (180 citations), Marketing (96 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations). Michael LaRocca has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kevin S. Groves, Forrest Scogin, William F. Chaplin, Alan Stevens, Elaine M. Bailey, Elizabeth A. DiNapoli, Graham J. McDougall, Ian M. McDonough, Marla L. Domino and Jamie Pardini. Their work appears in journals such as Aging & Mental Health, Journal of Business Ethics, Clinical Gerontologist, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society and Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact