Matthew Wright

1.0k citations
35 papers · 551 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Wright

28 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers

Matthew Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Earth-Surface Processes 121
  • Atmospheric Science 217
  • Anthropology 84
  • Clinical Psychology 130
  • Geology 24
Replace Elisabeth Morgan Thompson with:
Elisabeth Morgan Thompson United States
Ruth Robinson United Kingdom
Robert G.V. Baker Australia
Diego Salazar Chile
William S. Hart United States
Sue Hamilton United Kingdom
John Murray Ireland
C.T. Hoang France
William A. White United States
Carlos Alberto Andrade Amaya Portugal
Matthew Wright relative to Elisabeth Morgan Thompson United States Elisabeth Morgan Thompson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Elisabeth Morgan Thompson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Wright. The network helps show where Matthew Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Wright Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197585
2 199983
3 200376
4 199936
5 198032
6 198730
7 200027
8 200526
9 198026
10 199919
11 202317
12 200017
13 200911
14 202110
15 20068
16 20197
17 20136
18 20065
19 20165
20 20054

About Matthew Wright

Matthew Wright is a scholar working on Anthropology, Atmospheric Science, Sociology and Political Science, Ecology and Archeology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (12 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (7 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (4 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers), Geological formations and processes (3 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (3 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Earth-Surface Processes (121 citations), Atmospheric Science (217 citations), Anthropology (84 citations), Clinical Psychology (130 citations) and Geology (24 citations). Matthew Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include William Kelley Wright, David H. Roberts, Antony J. Long, Benjamin P. Horton, Piers Larcombe, Sarah Woodroffe, J. E. Whittaker, Andrew J. Plater, P. G. Appleby and J. Ridgway. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical Quarterly, Marine Geology, The American Journal of Philology, The Holocene and Ocean & Coastal Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact