Michael J. Baum

235 papers receiving 9.5k citations

Peers

Michael J. Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Sensory Systems 2.5k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Reproductive Medicine 2.8k
  • Social Psychology 3.6k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 896
Replace Sonoko Ogawa with:
Sonoko Ogawa United States
James G. Pfaus Canada
Richard B. Simerly United States
Walter E. Stumpf United States
Paul E. Micevych United States
Lennart Heimer United States
Gloria E. Hoffman United States
Jay S. Rosenblatt United States
Emilie F. Rissman United States
Yasuo Sakuma Japan
Michael J. Baum relative to Sonoko Ogawa United States Sonoko Ogawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Sonoko Ogawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Baum. The network helps show where Michael J. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael J. Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael J. Baum Line = papers co-authored together Michael J. Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 235 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992288
2 1979263
3 1973240
4 2008231
5 1987199
6 2009167
7 2000163
8 2004162
9 1999138
10 2007135
11 1996134
12 2009129
13 2014124
14 2006115
15 1993111
16 2002110
17 2006108
18 1977103
19 2008101
20 198698

About Michael J. Baum

Michael J. Baum is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Reproductive Medicine, Sensory Systems and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 235 papers that have together received 9.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (87 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (69 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (64 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (54 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (38 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (34 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (31 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (2.5k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Reproductive Medicine (2.8k citations), Social Psychology (3.6k citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (896 citations). Michael J. Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James A. Cherry, Julie Bakker, J. T. M. Vreeburg, Stuart Tobet, Barry J. Everitt, Kevin R. Kelliher, Mary S. Erskine, Scott R. Wersinger, Matthieu Keller and Heather Halem. Their work appears in journals such as Physiology & Behavior, Hormones and Behavior, Endocrinology, Biology of Reproduction and European Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact