N. Mendler

1.1k citations
71 papers · 754 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

N. Mendler

60 papers receiving 695 citations

Peers

N. Mendler
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 51
  • Biochemistry 68
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 222
  • Surgery 263
  • Emergency Medicine 52
Replace Fabrizio Follis with:
Fabrizio Follis United States
Lars Bagge Sweden
Alejandro Arís Spain
Tor Fröysaker Norway
Afksendyios Kalangos Switzerland
Osamu Shigeta Japan
Bernhard Wf United States
Saeed Ashraf United Kingdom
Tomoaki Jikuya Japan
Michael F. Swartz United States
N. Mendler relative to Fabrizio Follis United States Fabrizio Follis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Fabrizio Follis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Mendler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Mendler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Mendler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Mendler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Mendler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Mendler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Mendler. The network helps show where N. Mendler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Mendler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Mendler Line = papers co-authored together N. Mendler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000147
2 1977112
3 200186
4 199544
5 200228
6 200825
7 199018
8 197418
9 200717
10
Importance of the left ventricular subvalvular apparatus for cardiac performance.
199317
11 198716
12 200016
13 200014
14 199213
15 199011
16 197310
17 199110
18 196810
19 198410
20
In vitro studies on the mechanism of hyperacute xenograft rejection.
19719

About N. Mendler

N. Mendler is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Physiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 71 papers that have together received 754 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (9 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (8 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (7 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (7 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (6 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (6 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (51 citations), Biochemistry (68 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (222 citations), Surgery (263 citations) and Emergency Medicine (52 citations). N. Mendler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Romania. Frequent co-authors include H. Meisner, W. Heimisch, K Holper, F. Sebening, H. Schad, Rüdiger Lange, S. Hagl, Reinhold G. Erben, Michael J. Baum and J. Weipert. Their work appears in journals such as The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Basic Research in Cardiology, Intensive Care Medicine and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact