Michael Hoover

27 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

Michael Hoover
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 99
  • Family Practice 8
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 67
  • Language and Linguistics 35
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 32
Replace Ann McCann with:
Ann McCann United States
Terrence G. Horgan United States
Steven H. Cooper United States
Catherine Y. Read United States
K. Wedell United Kingdom
Karen E. Wolffe United States
Martin G. Brodwin United States
Greg Ryan United States
Andrew Grant United Kingdom
Mathieu Gagnon Canada
Michael Hoover relative to Ann McCann United States Ann McCann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Ann McCann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Hoover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Hoover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Hoover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Hoover more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Hoover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Hoover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Hoover. The network helps show where Michael Hoover may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Michael Hoover, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Hoover Line = papers co-authored together Michael Hoover links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201184
2 199867
3 199850
4 201841
5 201732
6
City on Fire: Hong Kong Cinema
199930
7 201826
8 201711
9 199710
10 199210
11 20188
12 20004
13 19974
14 20194
15 20034
16 19984
17 20203
18 20163
19 20063
20 20032

About Michael Hoover

Michael Hoover is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (4 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (2 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (2 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (2 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (99 citations), Family Practice (8 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (67 citations), Language and Linguistics (35 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (32 citations). Michael Hoover has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Veena D. Dwivedi, Greg Reid, Liane S. Feldman, Sebastian Demyttenaere, Melina C. Vassiliou, Benilde García Cabrero, Susanne P. Lajoie, Nancy Posel, Simon Bergman and David Fleiszer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of surgical education, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Transcultural Psychiatry, Educational Technology Research and Development and Language Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact