Transcultural Psychiatry

1.1k papers and 21.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Transcultural Psychiatry in the last decades have received a total of 21.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Transcultural Psychiatry usually cover Clinical Psychology (713 papers), Social Psychology (402 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (337 papers) specifically the topics of Migration, Health and Trauma (330 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (269 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (113 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Transcultural Psychiatry are Laurence J. Kirmayer, Joseph P. Gone, Christopher E. Lalonde, Michael J. Chandler, Mitchell G. Weiss, Morton Beiser, Joop de Jong, Derek Summerfield, Lisa Wexler and Devon E. Hinton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Transcultural Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Transcultural Psychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Transcultural Psychiatry.

Countries where authors publish in Transcultural Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Transcultural Psychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Transcultural Psychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Transcultural Psychiatry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025