Michael E. Bradley

2.9k citations
52 papers · 2.5k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Michael E. Bradley

51 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Michael E. Bradley
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Neurology 707
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 495
  • Molecular Biology 1.8k
  • Physiology 464
  • Physiology 88
Replace Ben H. Choi with:
Ben H. Choi United States
Laura Morelli Argentina
Akiko Maeda United States
Louise Nicholson New Zealand
Lan Jin United States
Frederick E. Williams United States
Yiyi Yang China
Benoı̂t Schneider France
Jan Eggermont Belgium
James N. Livingston United States
Michael E. Bradley relative to Ben H. Choi United States Ben H. Choi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
Ben H. Choi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Bradley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Bradley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Bradley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Bradley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Bradley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Bradley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Bradley. The network helps show where Michael E. Bradley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Bradley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Bradley Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Bradley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001491
2 1997407
3 2002216
4 1997106
5 199287
6 200377
7 199877
8 200471
9 199867
10 199865
11 200964
12 199857
13 198352
14 199949
15 199645
16 200744
17 199643
18 199941
19 199641
20 197141

About Michael E. Bradley

Michael E. Bradley is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science, Physiology, Economics and Econometrics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (9 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (6 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (6 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (5 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (4 papers) and Economic Theory and Policy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (707 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (495 citations), Molecular Biology (1.8k citations), Physiology (464 citations) and Physiology (88 citations). Michael E. Bradley has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Susan W. Liebman, Irina L. Derkatch, Joo Y. Hong, Ping‐Kun Zhou, Yury O. Chernoff, Iain L. O. Buxton, Herman K. Edskes, Reed B. Wickner, Cecil R. Reynolds and Techung Lee. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Pharmacology, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Genetics, Molecular Microbiology and History of Political Economy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact