British Journal for the History of Philosophy

7.6k citations
1.4k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Historical Philosophy and Science
    • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Philosophy top 1%
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy

Papers in

    • Historical Philosophy and Science 319
    • Philosophy, Science, and History 133
    • History of Science and Medicine 79
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 243
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 213
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 191
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy 151

British Journal for the History of Philosophy

948 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • History and Philosophy of Science 2.6k
  • Philosophy 4.9k
  • General Psychology 142
  • Theoretical Computer Science 114
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
Replace ˜The œreview of metaphysics with:
˜The œreview of metaphysics United States
International Studies in Philosophy United States
Teaching Philosophy United States
International Philosophical Quarterly United States
The Modern Schoolman United States
Dialogue Canada
Journal of the history of philosophy United States
Kant-Studien Germany
The Southern Journal of Philosophy United States
European Journal of Philosophy United States
British Journal for the History of Philosophy relative to ˜The œreview of metaphysics United States ˜The œreview of metaphysics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
˜The œreview of metaphysics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in British Journal for the History of Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in British Journal for the History of Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in British Journal for the History of Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Journal for the History of Philosophy more than expected).

Fields of papers published in British Journal for the History of Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in British Journal for the History of Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in British Journal for the History of Philosophy.

About British Journal for the History of Philosophy

The 1.4k papers published in British Journal for the History of Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 7.6k indexed citations . Papers published in British Journal for the History of Philosophy usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (477 papers), Philosophy (869 papers), General Psychology (25 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (181 papers) and Religious studies (70 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Philosophy and Science (319 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (243 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (213 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (191 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (151 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (145 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (133 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in British Journal for the History of Philosophy are Steven Nadler, Udo Thiel, Maria Rosa Antognazza, Mogens Lærke, Mathieu Marion, Michael Beaney, R. Lanier Anderson, Lena Halldenius, Patricia Springborg and Robert Stern.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact