Leonard Linsky

1.4k citations
35 papers · 744 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Leonard Linsky

27 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers

Leonard Linsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • History and Philosophy of Science 233
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 441
  • Philosophy 340
  • Theoretical Computer Science 15
  • General Psychology 12
Replace Benson Mates with:
Benson Mates United States
Robert Stoothoff United Kingdom
Desmond Paul Henry United Kingdom
Dorothy Grover United States
Erik Stenius Finland
Francesco Orilia Italy
Arthur Pap United States
Guy Stock United Kingdom
Alexander P. D. Mourelatos United States
Paul Henle
Leonard Linsky relative to Benson Mates United States Benson Mates's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Benson Mates · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leonard Linsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leonard Linsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leonard Linsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonard Linsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leonard Linsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leonard Linsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leonard Linsky. The network helps show where Leonard Linsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Leonard Linsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leonard Linsky Line = papers co-authored together Leonard Linsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Reference and modality
1971266
2 1953226
3 199236
4 197829
5
Early Analytic Philosophy Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein : Essays in Honor of Leonard Linsky
199727
6
Names and descriptions
197725
7 198823
8 196814
9 196314
10 197112
11 196910
12 195310
13 19546
14 19776
15 19666
16 19725
17
Le problème de la référence
19744
18 19724
19 19733
20 19573

About Leonard Linsky

Leonard Linsky is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Language and Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 35 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (2 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper), Advanced Algebra and Logic (1 paper) and linguistics and terminology studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (233 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (441 citations), Philosophy (340 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (15 citations) and General Psychology (12 citations). Leonard Linsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Antony Flew, Ruth Barcan Marcus, W. W. Tait, Roderick M. Chisholm, Paul Kecskemeti, Nathan Salmón and Philippe F. Devaux. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, The Philosophical Review, Analysis, Journal of the history of philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact