Mia Minnes

465 citations
28 papers · 179 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Mia Minnes

26 papers receiving 171 citations

Peers

Mia Minnes
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Computer Science Applications 100
  • Gender Studies 35
  • Media Technology 30
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 37
  • Safety Research 19
Replace Aletta Nylén with:
Aletta Nylén Sweden
Ayodele Abosede Ogegbo South Africa
Michela Maschietto Italy
Nick Rushby United Kingdom
Firas Almasri Kuwait
Suzanne R. Harper United States
Aimee J. Ellington United States
Gilles Aldon France
Luis Moreno–Armella Mexico
Hans-Georg Weigand Germany
Mia Minnes relative to Aletta Nylén Sweden Aletta Nylén's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Aletta Nylén · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mia Minnes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mia Minnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mia Minnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mia Minnes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mia Minnes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mia Minnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mia Minnes. The network helps show where Mia Minnes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Mia Minnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mia Minnes Line = papers co-authored together Mia Minnes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201835
2 201731
3 202211
4 202111
5 201711
6 20219
7 20229
8 20098
9
Practice Makes Deeper? Regular Reflective Writing during Engineering Internships
20177
10 20186
11 20185
12 20214
13 20204
14 20093
15 20243
16 20103
17 20193
18 20223
19 20203
20 20242

About Mia Minnes

Mia Minnes is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 179 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (9 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (9 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (4 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (3 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (3 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (100 citations), Gender Studies (35 citations), Media Technology (30 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (37 citations) and Safety Research (19 citations). Mia Minnes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christine Alvarado, Leo Porter, Bakhadyr Khoussainov, Jiamou Liu, Kristen Vaccaro, Joe Gibbs Politz, Maziar Ghazinejad, Nathan Delson, Jace Hargıs and Curt Schurgers. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, Journal of Symbolic Logic, Theoretical Computer Science, ACM Transactions on Computing Education and Computer Science Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact