Melisa Duque

18 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Melisa Duque
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Human-Computer Interaction 47
  • Geography, Planning and Development 22
  • Conservation 12
  • Museology 12
  • Safety Research 23
Replace Helen Thornham with:
Helen Thornham United Kingdom
Daniel López Gómez Spain
Michela Cozza Sweden
Blanca Callén Spain
Peter Danholt Denmark
Xiaoyuan Tan China
Karen Stendal Norway
Biqiang Liu Australia
Xiling Xiong China
Chieh‐Wen Sheng Taiwan
Melisa Duque relative to Helen Thornham United Kingdom Helen Thornham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Helen Thornham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melisa Duque

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melisa Duque's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melisa Duque with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melisa Duque more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melisa Duque

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melisa Duque. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melisa Duque. The network helps show where Melisa Duque may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Melisa Duque, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melisa Duque Line = papers co-authored together Melisa Duque links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2018119
2 202245
3 202022
4 202122
5 201918
6 201912
7 202012
8 20228
9 20227
10 20205
11 20195
12
Engaging with ghosts, idiots & ______ - Otherness in Participatory Design
20172
13 20192
14
Smart Homes for Seniors: Intelligent Home Solutions for Independent Living
20212
15 20201
16 20241
17 20241
18 20201

About Melisa Duque

Melisa Duque is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction, Demography, Museology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 18 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Participatory Visual Research Methods (5 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (4 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (3 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (3 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (2 papers), Smart Cities and Technologies (2 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (47 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (22 citations), Conservation (12 citations), Museology (12 citations) and Safety Research (23 citations). Melisa Duque has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Pink, Robert Willim, Minna Ruckenstein, Shanti Sumartojo, Yolande Strengers, Vaike Fors, Débora Lanzeni, Larissa Nicholls, Juan Francisco Salazar and Ben Horan. Their work appears in journals such as Big Data & Society, Home Cultures, Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Mobilities and Digital Creativity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact