Débora Lanzeni

11 papers receiving 210 citations

Peers

Débora Lanzeni
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Human-Computer Interaction 37
  • Communication 30
  • Safety Research 31
  • Museology 11
  • Sociology and Political Science 105
Replace Tonia Sutherland with:
Tonia Sutherland United States
Sareeta Amrute United States
Michael Dieter United Kingdom
Fernando Secomandi Netherlands
Michela Cozza Sweden
Aarti Israni United States
Jason Ohler United States
Aakash Gautam United States
Marie Hicks United States
Ben Pettis United States
Débora Lanzeni relative to Tonia Sutherland United States Tonia Sutherland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tonia Sutherland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Débora Lanzeni

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Débora Lanzeni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Débora Lanzeni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Débora Lanzeni more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Débora Lanzeni

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Débora Lanzeni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Débora Lanzeni. The network helps show where Débora Lanzeni may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Débora Lanzeni, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Débora Lanzeni Line = papers co-authored together Débora Lanzeni links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2018100
2 202245
3 201824
4 202218
5 202214
6 20217
7 20147
8 20202
9 20162
10
Antropología digital y de los medios: retos teóricos, cruces metodológicos y nuevos tópicos
20141
11 20221
12 20250

About Débora Lanzeni

Débora Lanzeni is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Computer Networks and Communications, Safety Research, Museology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 12 papers that have together received 221 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media and Digital Communication (3 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Indigenous Cultures and History (1 paper), Photographic and Visual Arts (1 paper) and Indigenous Studies in Latin America (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (37 citations), Communication (30 citations), Safety Research (31 citations), Museology (11 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (105 citations). Débora Lanzeni has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Spain and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Pink, Heather A. Horst, Vaike Fors, Shanti Sumartojo, Yolande Strengers, Melisa Duque, María-José Masanet, Rachel Charlotte Smith, Louisa Jorm and Susan Michie. Their work appears in journals such as F1000Research, New Media & Society, Antípoda Revista de Antropología y Arqueología, Big Data & Society and Social Media + Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact