Megan Keyes

910 citations
12 papers · 718 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Megan Keyes

12 papers receiving 704 citations

Peers

Megan Keyes
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 268
  • Clinical Psychology 310
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 264
  • Biological Psychiatry 31
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 118
Replace Stephen R. Paige with:
Stephen R. Paige United States
Daniel V. Zuj Australia
Rianne A. de Kleine Netherlands
Sheila A. M. Rauch United States
Evan D. Kanter United States
Vincent Corbo United States
Santiago Papini United States
Justine Phifer United States
Arthur R. Rademaker Netherlands
Kristen M. Wrocklage United States
Megan Keyes relative to Stephen R. Paige United States Stephen R. Paige's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Stephen R. Paige · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Megan Keyes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan Keyes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan Keyes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan Keyes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan Keyes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan Keyes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan Keyes. The network helps show where Megan Keyes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Megan Keyes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Megan Keyes Line = papers co-authored together Megan Keyes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2009247
2 2007175
3 2005125
4 200664
5 200824
6 200019
7 200616
8
The first thousand days: an evidence paper - summary
201715
9 201714
10 200712
11 20116
12 20101

About Megan Keyes

Megan Keyes is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 12 papers that have together received 718 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (268 citations), Clinical Psychology (310 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (264 citations), Biological Psychiatry (31 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (118 citations). Megan Keyes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Erica Duncan, Tanja Jovanović, Ana M. Fiallos, Karyn M. Myers, Seth D. Norrholm, Michael Davis, Michael Davis, Jillian C. Shipherd, David J. Ready and Barbara Lewison. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Behavioral Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry, Pain Medicine and Journal of Personality Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact