Daniel V. Zuj

1.1k citations
30 papers · 599 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel V. Zuj

29 papers receiving 598 citations

Peers

Daniel V. Zuj
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 164
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 207
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 296
  • Clinical Psychology 158
  • Biological Psychiatry 16
Replace Puck Duits with:
Puck Duits Netherlands
Megan Keyes United States
Anna Gerlicher Netherlands
Stacey J. Dubois United States
Nineequa Q. Blanding United States
Marieke Effting Netherlands
Dorothée Bentz Switzerland
Ana M. Fiallos United States
Ansgar Rougemont-Bücking Switzerland
Vanessa A. van Ast Netherlands
Daniel V. Zuj relative to Puck Duits Netherlands Puck Duits's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Puck Duits · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel V. Zuj

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel V. Zuj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel V. Zuj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel V. Zuj more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel V. Zuj

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel V. Zuj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel V. Zuj. The network helps show where Daniel V. Zuj may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel V. Zuj, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel V. Zuj Line = papers co-authored together Daniel V. Zuj links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016110
2 202175
3 201865
4 201841
5 201839
6 201638
7 202030
8 202128
9 201821
10 202016
11 202016
12 201714
13 201814
14 202213
15 201713
16 201712
17 20228
18 20227
19 20217
20 20227

About Daniel V. Zuj

Daniel V. Zuj is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 30 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (11 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (8 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers) and Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (164 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (207 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (296 citations), Clinical Psychology (158 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (16 citations). Daniel V. Zuj has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Iceland. Frequent co-authors include Kim L. Felmingham, Matthew A. Palmer, Seth D. Norrholm, Miriam J.J. Lommen, Jayne Morriss, Gaëtan Mertens, Simon Dymond, Emma Nicholson, Luke J. Ney and Richard A. Bryant. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Depression and Anxiety, Psychoneuroendocrinology, PLoS ONE and International Journal of Psychophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact