Megan E. Kurth

22 papers receiving 465 citations

Peers

Megan E. Kurth
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 205
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 122
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 36
  • Physiology 100
  • Applied Psychology 12
Replace Esther F. Afolalu with:
Esther F. Afolalu United Kingdom
Andreas Jaehne Germany
Laura B. Palmese United States
Mei Ling Song South Korea
Nan‐Ying Chiu Taiwan
Fatanah Ramlee Malaysia
Daniela Roditi United States
T. Rico United States
Jane Hicks United Kingdom
Alessia Beracci Italy
Megan E. Kurth relative to Esther F. Afolalu United Kingdom Esther F. Afolalu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27.5×
Esther F. Afolalu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Megan E. Kurth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan E. Kurth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan E. Kurth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan E. Kurth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan E. Kurth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan E. Kurth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan E. Kurth. The network helps show where Megan E. Kurth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Megan E. Kurth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Megan E. Kurth Line = papers co-authored together Megan E. Kurth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201076
2 201075
3 201356
4 201649
5 201138
6 200933
7 200924
8 201121
9 200917
10 201214
11 201913
12 201913
13 20158
14 20188
15 20188
16 20177
17 20177
18 20184
19 20182
20 20181

About Megan E. Kurth

Megan E. Kurth is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 22 papers that have together received 476 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (7 papers), Sleep and related disorders (7 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (2 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (205 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (122 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (36 citations), Physiology (100 citations) and Applied Psychology (12 citations). Megan E. Kurth has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Stein, Bradley J. Anderson, Katherine M. Sharkey, Richard P. Millman, Kirk J. Brower, Deirdre A. Conroy, Celeste M. Caviness, David R. Strong, Jennifer Olson and Yael Chatav Schonbrun. Their work appears in journals such as Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal of Addictive Diseases, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Stigma and Health and Journal of Addiction Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact