Kelly E. Moore

77 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Kelly E. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Clinical Psychology 420
  • Applied Psychology 63
  • General Health Professions 308
  • Sociology and Political Science 496
  • Plant Science 376
Replace Gwen E. Chapman with:
Gwen E. Chapman Canada
Katie Ward United Kingdom
Frank Lawrence United States
Ross Coomber United Kingdom
Bethany A. Bell United States
Carla Meurk Australia
Rachel Povey United Kingdom
Chris Fife‐Schaw United Kingdom
Allan L. McCutcheon United States
Michelle Williams United States
Kelly E. Moore relative to Gwen E. Chapman Canada Gwen E. Chapman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Gwen E. Chapman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kelly E. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kelly E. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kelly E. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kelly E. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kelly E. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kelly E. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kelly E. Moore. The network helps show where Kelly E. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kelly E. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kelly E. Moore Line = papers co-authored together Kelly E. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996268
2 1992181
3 2013159
4 2018139
5 2015120
6 201368
7 198961
8 201257
9 201752
10 201646
11 201837
12 201835
13 201834
14 201634
15 201830
16 201328
17 201825
18 201624
19 202223
20 201721

About Kelly E. Moore

Kelly E. Moore is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (22 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (15 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (13 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (10 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (10 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (8 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (420 citations), Applied Psychology (63 citations), General Health Professions (308 citations), Sociology and Political Science (496 citations) and Plant Science (376 citations). Kelly E. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Susan Leigh Star, June P. Tangney, Jeffrey Stuewig, Sherry A. McKee, Walter Roberts, Lindsay Oberleitner, Terril L. Verplaetse, Kathryn Smith, Noel Chávez and Alison Hope Alkon. Their work appears in journals such as Euphytica, Stigma and Health, Deviant Behavior, Health & Justice and Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact