Daniela Roditi

9 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers

Daniela Roditi
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 84
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 78
  • Pharmacology 88
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 88
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 27
Replace Stéphanie Cormier with:
Stéphanie Cormier Canada
Jennifer M. Mundt United States
Marcelo Rivano Fischer Sweden
Ilse Viane Belgium
Lin Yu United Kingdom
Joshua S. Green United States
Denise Beasley United States
Rebecca Czlapinski United States
Michael P. Berry United States
Sophia Åkerblom Sweden
Daniela Roditi relative to Stéphanie Cormier Canada Stéphanie Cormier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Stéphanie Cormier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Roditi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Roditi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Roditi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Roditi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Roditi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Roditi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Roditi. The network helps show where Daniela Roditi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Roditi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Roditi Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Roditi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2011154
2 201887
3 201045
4 201626
5 201222
6 200917
7 201115
8 201010
9 20111

About Daniela Roditi

Daniela Roditi is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Family Practice and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (1 paper), Sleep and related disorders (1 paper), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper), Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper) and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (84 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (78 citations), Pharmacology (88 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (88 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (27 citations). Daniela Roditi has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael E. Robinson, Jennifer M. Mundt, Christina S. McCrae, Jacob M. Williams, Lori B. Waxenberg, Ashley Curtis, Ryan J. Anderson, Mary Beth Miller, Roland Staud and Richard B. Berry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain, Journal of Pain Research, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Psychology Research and Behavior Management and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact